Thursday, February 28, 2013

Why You Should Avoid Mills Properties AT ALL COSTS


No matter what you do on this planet, do not rent from Mills Properties, particularly its Park Val location. If you have any family or friends who are looking for places to live, advise them against renting from Mills Properties. If you have any enemies who are considering renting from Mills Properties, and you take a perverse joy in their mistake, please consider professional psychiatric help. No person in the world deserves the kind of bullshit that Mills Properties unrepentantly produces.

I recognize that virtually anybody who has ever rented an apartment anywhere has some kind of horror story associated with it. Perhaps a case of damaged apartment components, or overcharging deposits, or something of that nature. Hell, when I was in college, a house I was renting had a bathroom door unhinged that we just kind of worked around because our landlord was lazy and kept putting off having it fixed. This situation isn’t even in the same stratosphere of utter incompetence as what Mills Properties offered. I’m not going to argue that it’s the worst apartment lender in the world because I don’t know all of them. But here is my story, and here is why no person you have never met (provided you have never met an authoritarian dictator or an al-Qaeda terrorist) is lowly enough to deserve to settle for Mills Properties.

In my quest to move out of my childhood bedroom, I looked at a few different apartment complexes and one Saturday, I toured Park Val. I looked at the demonstration room and asked a few basic questions. You said that the apartments are all-hardwood floors—Don’t worry about the carpeting in this room, it’s just the demonstration room. What municipality is this in?—Webster Groves. I was surprised to hear that the apartment complex was in Webster Groves—Park Val is literally right behind Shrewsbury Lanes and the route to get there from my house indisputably involves entering the city of St. Louis yet I saw no sign saying that I had entered Webster Groves. But whatever. The apartment seemed relatively nice for the price.

I went to the apartment a few weeks later to go through with an application. I went on a Saturday because I wanted to avoid going during the week as much as I could—I get off work at 5 p.m. and the office closed at 5:30 p.m., and while my boss is extremely nice and would have no problem with me taking a short lunch and leaving at 4:30 p.m., I’ve only been worked at my current place of employment for a little over three months and I don’t really want to push it when I do not have an immediate need to do so. I went and applied and paid the application fee. The next day, I was called and told I had been approved, so I got my boss to approve of me leaving early the next day while I went to go sign the lease on that Monday.

Two interesting things happened on that Monday. First, when looking at the terms I had been given, the rent was higher than what had been promised. Like, fifty dollars higher. I immediately pointed out the difference and the facility manager immediately relented, saying that the price I had been promised when I first looked was a “sale” price. Regardless, he offered me a workaround deal—basically, I could have to pay $10 more per month but in exchange, he would cut an initial application charge by $50 and then take $70 off of my first month’s rent. Fine. I’d pay $120 extra over the course of a year and save $120 off the top. Makes no difference to me. The second interesting thing was that I would not be able to sign a “lease” per se that day; it turned out that the previous tenant was still living in the apartment after the lease had expired, paying beyond the initial monthly rent because that person needed some initial time to move out. Okay, fine, I figured. That person was said to be moving out on Wednesday. After that, I could sign a lease. The next week, the lease was signed.

Once the lease was signed, I started buying furnishings. A large TV for my living room; a kitchen table and chairs; a couch. I hate spending money en masse but now that the lease was signed, I had to get the ball rolling. The long process was finally over and on March 1st, I would be able to enjoy the fruits of my labor. On February 21st, I got out of work early due to snow and I attempted to take care of the three main utility-ish things I needed to do before the lease started. Step one was easy—ordering internet and cable. Took about ten minutes with no issue. Step two was somewhat more difficult—renter’s insurance. I was told that I would be able to get a discount on it but I couldn’t get an answer at Park Val, so I put that off. Step three was getting utilities switched over to my name, but according to Ameren, the property manager had yet to verify that I was assuming the responsibility.

On Saturday the 23rd, I got a hold of Park Val. I was worked through the renter’s insurance process. Upon suggestion, I signed up for a one-time payment for the year on the insurance—the last thing I want is to have to remember to make a nominal payment every month if I don’t have to do so, right? The manager said they would call on Monday to Ameren to get things switched over. Sweet.

Tuesday comes around and I took a break at work to call Ameren. Same thing as before—the property manager hadn’t called in. So I called Park Val again. As was often the case, I had to leave a voicemail message. When I hadn’t been called by the end of the day, I sent an e-mail. On Wednesday, I got a voicemail around 9:30 in the morning from Park Val saying to call. Okay. The manager wasn’t there when I called back. I usually like to keep my cell phone in airplane mode early in the day to preserve the battery but I decided to keep a watchful eye and/or ear on the phone, hoping, since the lease began in two days, I could get the Ameren situation taken care of sooner rather than later. At 11:45 p.m., Park Val called back.

“Hey John, um, do you think you’d be able to move in next Wednesday?”

Um, no. Why would I be able to move in next Wednesday? My lease is arranged for this Friday. I lined up for my furniture to be ready for in-store pickup by Saturday. I arranged to have a friend help me with the heavy lifting for that Saturday. I had the people from Charter coming in on Saturday. This is a joke, right? It’s a joke—I’m going to stammer around a little bit in response and then be told I’d been had there. Well, it turns out I had been had long before yesterday.

The reason why I was being asked if I could move in next Wednesday was because the previous tenant, the person for whom I had ostensibly been waiting to leave the apartment, was still living in the apartment. I had signed a lease for an apartment that, for all intents and purposes, did not exist.

“I mean, no,” I said, “I can’t really move in next Wednesday. I mean, I have all my movers mobilized for Saturday and we have furniture and cable coming by and…”

“Look, John, there’s really nothing I can do.”

In some ways, this is true. In more ways it’s a heaping pile of bullshit, but in the sense of “I would have to give a notice of eviction”, it’s true. But the point remains that I had signed a lease, effective on the 1st of March in 2013, to take possession of an apartment in the Park Val complex. I had even been told by this same person mind you that I would need to wait until the previous tenant had left to sign a lease. I then signed a lease.

“We can start eviction proceedings now but it could take up to 90 days.”

Okay then, so what you’re saying is this whole ‘You can move in on Wednesday’ thing is totally contingent on if this person decides to change his or her mind and abide by the rules and by normal sets up interpersonal decorum? 90 days sounds wrong too, but that’s really just a drop in the bucket compared to what you’re saying so far.

“Look, here’s what I can do for you. For your inconvenience, I can knock $100 off your first month’s rent. That’s all I’m authorized to do.”

Oh, so for my “inconvenience” you’re going to offer me what is essentially a prorated refund on the time I won’t be able to get in the apartment. Go fuck yourself. Holy shit I just want to rail into this dumbass right now. But I’m at work; even though I’m in the hallway I’m pretty sure if I hurl obscenities at you, I’ll at the best get stares and at the worst get reprimanded.

“John, are you still there?”

Yes, fuck face, I’m still here. It’s almost like being told that apparently a signed lease agreement doesn’t count as a binding legal contract in a professional leasing organization’s world would come as a bit of a surprise to somebody.

“Yeah, I’m still…look, let me call you back, I need to get some things together. Bye.”

I hung up and felt dizzy. I was angry, but I was also confused. Like, how is this not over? If I signed a lease, how was that not the end of the process? Not sure what to do, I called my mom. She was probably angrier than I was, or at least didn’t make any particular effort to hide it. Luckily for me, she was actually in the area at the time and went by Park Val to figure out what was going on. I didn’t have the capacity to investigate this entire matter by myself but luckily, she did.

When I got off the phone initially, I thought my landlord was an incompetent idiot. Turns out my mom got to experience a new low in customer service and general human decency. Now, anyone who knows both me and my mom knows that we have fairly different personalities—I’m a pretty relaxed person, in general (internet bluster aside), very much a go-with-the-flow type. My mom will, for better or worse (and in the upcoming story, much much better), talk back. And sometimes this leads to some, um, interesting moments. As much as I don’t really like the idea of my mom fighting my battles for me, the results were so indisputably great this time that I can’t argue against it.

My mom walked into the office and said “You just got off the phone with my son,” and the landlord immediately went into defense mode. When asked why a lease would be offered to an apartment that wasn’t available, the response was “Well, your son was really insistent on getting a lease signed as soon as possible.” Well, of course I was insistent on this—I wanted to make sure I didn’t get swindled. It hadn’t occurred to me that there were steps beyond signing the lease (but really though, I was pretty disappointed to hear that, apparently, my merely wanting something to happen would make it so. Shit, why did I settle for a mildly crappy apartment on the city/county line? I should have made a play for the White House. Or at least M.C. Hammer’s. I mean, that’s probably not that hard to get, right?).

The next question was “Have you done this before?” This is the part where some of you will probably think I’m just telling a fictional story but I swear to God on my mother’s life (and if it turns out this is a lie, it serves my mother’s right for lying) this is what happened. The response was yes. “Has this ever happened, where the person just doesn’t leave?” The response, which is up there with that time Ted Stevens referred to the internet as “a series of tubes” in terms of hilarity-amidst-horror incompetence, was “Yeah, it’s happened a few times. It’s just a risk I like to take.”

Oh, okay then. A risk you like to take. An interesting “risk”, I must say—since it’s really not a risk to you. The person for whom it is a risk, the person whose home is at stake, was not consulted. And I say this as a person who goes to casinos more often than would probably be considered socially acceptable—I wouldn’t risk money unless there was a chance of winning back more than I put in. There is no advantage to this “risk” other than for Park Val to get my money. But no problem—my mom took it a step further than I had wanted. She went to Mills Properties headquarters.

They were a bit better, though this is a fairly low bar. Basically, they won a 100-meter dash in which every other competitor had false started. But most importantly, they gave some more information. First of all, you know how I was told the apartment was in Webster Groves? Nope—St. Louis city. This isn’t even really a big factor for me, besides the obvious of “I don’t like when people lie to me.” And as for the 5:30 closing time which forced me to leave work early? Welp, turns out the office isn’t supposed to close until 6. This was news to Mills Properties. They tried to placate the anger by saying that, because of the lies I had faced and because of the fact that they obviously could not uphold their end of the lease, they could end the lease and refund the charges I had incurred. They were supposed to call today, Thursday, to get things resolved. And they did.

I got a voicemail from the corporate office: “Well, the apartment you had will be available on Wednesday, if you can take the day off or if you can just move in on that Saturday, and for your trouble we’ll be able to refund half the month’s rent.”

Same shit, different day.

So that’s where I am right now. I left a voicemail for them saying that I was sick of being lied to, that their end of the bargain had not been lived up to, and that I wanted to end my relationship with Mills Properties. Apparently, this wasn’t good enough. I’d compare Mills to used car salesmen, but no matter how much a used car salesman lied to you, I can pretty much guarantee that you got some kind of car out of the deal. But even when caught in the most unbelievable lie you could possibly fathom in a rental agreement, one in which property is not only not available but even though this was known already, it wasn’t brought up to the moving party until two days before the lease began. And the process starts again. Four figures spent on furniture and general household accessories that will now have to stay in my parents’ garage and my grandmother’s basement until I can find an apartment not run by “people” that are such lying sacks of shit. It can serve as a temporary symbol of a company I would never recommend to anyone, under any circumstances.

This is just the beginning: There won’t be a rental review website on the internet that doesn’t have a truncated version of my story on it soon. If you have any other rental horror stories, please leave them in the comments section. All companies who treat people like dirt should be exposed. I don’t expect that any business’s first and foremost goal will not be to make money—I do, however, expect a basic level of humanity and conscience. Rent through Mills Properties/Park Val as your own risk—you’ve been warned. This sort of thing happens there.

Don’t worry, people reading this who read my blog regularly—I’ll go back to sports lists and references to obscure Oasis b-sides soon!

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Why I Hate Michael Jordan

This sounds like heresy, being a 24 year-old Chicago Bulls fan, but I cannot stand Michael Jordan.

It's partially his fault, and it's partially the fault of the media that made him the unfathomably huge star that he became. It's Michael Jordan's 50th birthday and ESPN will absolutely NOT SHUT UP about it. It's insanity. I get that he's generally accepted as the greatest of all-time in his sport, but do you know when Wayne Gretzky's birthday is? Do you know Pele's birthday? Any of the dozen or so living NFL alumni often regarded as the greatest ever? Because I don't. Nor do I feel like they've been slighted--who cares? But why does MJ get all of the attention?

Michael Jordan is one of the greatest players in NBA history; this I will not dispute. I will dispute that he is THE greatest player of all-time, and I will sure as Hell dispute that he's so clearly the greatest player of all-time that any suggestions to the contrary are blasphemy. Wilt Chamberlain, in 1961-62, averaged 50.4 PPG, 25.7 RPG, and averaged 48.5 MPG (seriously, he averaged more minutes than exist in a regular NBA game). Nobody else besides Wilt has averaged 40 in a season. Wilt did it twice. Wilt had four straight seasons in which he outscored MJ's best season. And don't give me the totally BS argument of how it was easier to do that in Wilt's era--if it was easier, how come nobody else did it? Sure, Jordan had more rings than Wilt Chamberlain (6 to 2). Bill Russell had eleven. Hell, Robert Horry had seven. Teammates matter in the equation. It's not an individual accomplishment.

But my problem really isn't that people think Jordan is the best NBA player ever because there is certainly a compelling case that he is. But that people refuse to even consider alternatives. Saying MJ isn't the best NBA player ever unreservedly is tantamount to saying the Beatles aren't the greatest band ever--siding with MJ or the Beatles is a safe and not terrible opinion, but it's not such a goddamned blowout that conversation isn't merited. People freak out and get upset if Lebron James is compared to Michael Jordan. And I don't even think James is in MJ's class yet but why can't we at least discuss it? Lebron is a better rebounder and arguably a better defender; MJ is a better scorer by a lot but IT'S A DISCUSSION PEOPLE.

But the real problem with MJ isn't that he's overrated as a player; it's that he's overrated as a person.

A lot of people like to cite Michael Jordan's importance as a marketer and as a corporate icon. Won't dispute it. I will dispute that this is something he should be proud of. I don't blame him for it: This is capitalism and he has every right to shill for every product under the sun if he wants to do so. And I also have the right to point out that he's a corporate whore. He was certainly more important to Madison Avenue than, say, Muhammad Ali, but that doesn't make him more admirable. Ali alienated large portions of the country through his actions and what he said. Jim Brown (who also has a birthday today) used his status as an elite athlete to promote civil rights causes. Let's not even get started on Jackie Robinson. Michael Jordan's contribution to society is selling overpriced shoes. 

To me, the definitive MJ moment isn't one of the championships or great highlights--it's his response when he was asked in 1990 why he wouldn't endorse Harvey Gantt against Jesse Helms in a North Carolina Senate election (Sidebar: This shouldn't be viewed historically as a battle between a Democrat and a Republican--it should be viewed as Anybody vs. Jesse Helms). His response was the legendarily weak-kneed line "Republicans buy sneakers, too." Yep, that's why he didn't make what had to be the least controversial partisan political endorsement ever. Not even necessarily that he DISAGREED that Harvey Gantt was the superior candidate. Just that he wanted to make a few more bucks. Again, his right, but this shows all that needs to be said about the fact that Michael Jordan aspired to be a corporation unto himself. All the things people have ripped Tiger Woods for--being a bland, boring superstar who whitewashed any negativity in his private life for the sake of expanding his bank account--applied to Michael Jordan a decade prior.

The last decade since MJ's retirement has proven something I always suspected--Jordan is really only good at basketball. He failed as an executive, helping the Wizards sink to new lows and now being behind the worst NBA franchise mess, the Charlotte Bobcats, of my lifetime. He failed as a gambler, losing millions. He failed as a husband, being divorced amidst adultery. His Hall of Fame speech was legendarily self-serving and vicious, excoriating his currently-homeless high school basketball coach. Hell, his Birmingham Barons career might have been his third-best facet (behind basketball and using his basketball skill to sell things).

With all of that said, I loved watching Michael Jordan play. He was terrific on the court. I wish the sports media would shut up about him for two seconds so perhaps we as a people could go back to enjoying him again.

Sunday, February 3, 2013

The Five Greatest Super Bowl Halftime Shows

With American musical preferences as varied as they are, the Super Bowl Halftime Show is the one place where the entire world watches a concert. And everyone watches it. Even if you hate the performer (see: Eyed Peas, Black), you still watch. And believe me, most of the concerts have been TERRIBLE. But here are the five best.

5. Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers--2008: Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers are really the perfect example of a band that gets what it is. They've never been cool but at the same time, they've never been uncool. They're a traditionalist, Rolling Stones-meets-Byrds band, that has spent most of the last three and a half decades making strong, untranscendent rock and roll. And in 2008, they performed a strong, solid set at the Super Bowl halftime show. I do have to deduct points based on their song selection (three of the four songs came from a Tom Petty solo album, and yes, there is a difference between Tom Petty solo and Tom Petty with the Heartbreakers and the latter is better), but "Runnin' Down a Dream" is a grand song to play at the Super Bowl, and when a band can play a song about a girl committing suicide ("American Girl") and nobody bats an eye, that is rock and roll at its finest.

4. Michael Jackson--1993: As I've said before, Michael Jackson was not a great musician, but he was a great performer. He was, especially at his peak (though this probably qualifies as slightly past his peak), the perfect person to do the halftime show. And this was a vital halftime show--once the biggest star in the world did the halftime show, Up With People was screwed. His performance provoked the ratings of the game to go UP, somehow. And his song selection was pretty strong too ("Jam", "Billie Jean"--his best song and nobody will ever convince me it's close, and "Black or White").

3. Paul McCartney--2005: The Super Bowl the year prior, with the wardrobe malfunction, sucked. I hated the music in it to such an extent that even being the fifteen year-old boy I was, the presence of boobies didn't make it much better. So in 2005, they brought in the living dean of popular music. It's that simple. If Paul McCartney is on the bill, he will never not be the final act. With all the great bands at the Olympics and at the Hurricane Sandy benefit concert, it centered around Sir Paul. There were several "safe" elements about this show--the songs, the selection in and of itself, and the decided lack of wardrobe malfunctions. But Sir Paul could have come out and taken a bow and it still would have been better than the awful Rolling Stones (who I like) performance the next year.

2. U2--2002: I didn't grasp the greatness of this performance at the time because I was too busy freaking out about the Rams, but upon further replays, this was pretty great. Could any band other than U2 have done what they did? Regardless of your opinion on their music, they are the ultimate stadium band. Their stadium shows are practically Billy Graham revivals. "Beautiful Day", still a fresh new song at the time was good enough on its own to make this list, but "Where the Streets Have No Name" being played with the names of 9/11 victims scrolling in the background...amazing.

1. Prince--2007: Prince is simply a genius. He will always be compared to Michael Jackson, because they were both super-popular solo African-American artists during the same time frame. But Prince was in a class of his own. He wasn't just a great vocalist and a great showman--he was a spectacular guitarist/multi-instrumentalist and songwriter, and in his halftime show of the pretty bad Super Bowl 41 allowed him to flaunt all of his many powers. He played bits of six songs and even though he's one of the best songwriters of his generation, three were covers. The three highlights were, in order--his performance of his best hard rock song ("Let's Go Crazy"), his scathing/soulful/fierce Foo Fighters cover ("Best of You", in a version that members of the band have admitted is better than their original), and his too-grand-for-words rendition of "Purple Rain", which had all the guitar heroics of his original but also included AN ACTUAL RAINSTORM STARTING DURING THE SONG. God Bless You, Prince.

The Grobitch Confessional

Hello, my name is John Fleming. I am twenty-four years old. And I am the founder of the Twitter account @grobitch20.

This seems like a silly coming-out really; I suspect that for most people who follow both me and Grobitch on Twitter (which is a lot of people, many of whom interestingly enough followed Grobitch before following me, including the man who eventually outed me), this comes as about as big of a surprise as when George Michael came out in 1998. It’s a formality; it isn’t Earth-shattering news. Like George Michael, I’m only confessing because I got caught, but I knew this day would come. Frankly, I’m surprised it took as long as it did. I never wanted to go out on top. That wouldn’t be in the spirit of Grobitch. I wanted it to go down in flames.

I hope that anyone who reads this who is amused by Grobitch is amused for the same reasons I had so much fun doing it. Grobitch is a parody of @grobot20, not an indictment. Is the account critical of its target? No question. But it is also, as its bio long said, “a loving tribute to @grobot20.” For anyone who doesn’t know, I am actually friends with Nick in real life. And we were friends before I got Twitter. In fact, I got Twitter largely because Nick said I would enjoy it. He was right. And if I weren’t at least somewhat amused by his shtick, I’d have no particular motivation to satirize him. And that is why I started Grobitch. This account has lasted ten months. It started when Nick was an undergraduate and he’s now closer to the end than the beginning of Masters degree studies. I’ve had three different jobs since it started. It’s been a fun ten months and here is the story.

Of all of my friends, Nick is the only one that I think could have a half-decent parody account made about him. First of all, he tweets a lot. Second of all, he tweets passionately—he doesn’t just say what’s going on his day, but rather he tweets excitedly about sports, TV, or whatever’s on his mind. Third, and most importantly, he has a great sense of humor. This isn’t necessarily the same thing as being funny, as most people seem to think. A sense of humor means he can, well, sense humor. He can appreciate humor, even when it is derisively directed to him. He would probably be reluctant to admit this, but I suspect the only person who enjoyed Grobitch more than I did was he himself. And fourth, and almost as importantly, he had a large Twitter base upon which to build a following. You can’t parody somebody that has twelve followers. Frankly, I suspected Grobitch would end up with about twelve followers anyway.

Grobitch was founded the night of the NCAA Men’s Basketball Championship between Kentucky and Kansas and it was the perfect night to do it. Nick hates Kansas basketball (as all good Americans do) and was destined to passionately live-tweet the game. However, I had actually gotten the idea for a parody account of Nick that weekend, when I went up to Kirksville for the initiation of the fraternity of which we are both members. While #LadiesLoveThemSomeGrobot, as Grobitch so often hashtagged, was actually invented by me (as myself, not as Grobitch) as a fairly sarcastic mocking, it’s kind of true. It was the second straight semester that I had come up for initiation and it was the second straight semester that, with Nick not even around, he came up in conversation and I realized that something I hadn’t foreseen was happening here. Nick was becoming something of an institution, as silly and absurd as that sounds. But anyway, the basketball game would be a tremendous opportunity for me to exhibit some of the memes that became Grobitch’s trademark. The memes were insane exaggerations of things the real Nick would use on Twitter, but they soon became the basis of the exaggeration. As with all satire, the solution isn’t to use non-sequitors; it is to become something of a caricature.

The first Grobitch tweet came at 9:00 p.m. on April 2, 2012. “Kansas is proving right now that they’re overrated. The SEC is the best conference in the universe. #MIZSEC #NotBiased.” In retrospect this was an okay tweet, as it does pick up on a secondary Grobitch meme of ridiculing homerism. Tweet 2 said “Doron Lamb is getting laid tonight. Just like me.” Thus beginning Grobitch’s infatuation with “the ladies” (or “teh ladies” if you prefer). Tweet 6 is, in my opinion, the tweet that really launched Grobitch: “Bill Self is an asshat. Thomas Robinson is an asshat. Everybody is an asshat.” It’s a totally insane comment that Nick on his worst day wouldn’t even make but at the same time, it works as satire. It calls people an asshat and it evolves from calling Bill Self an asshat (which I’d be surprised if Nick hasn’t done directly), to calling Thomas Robinson an asshat (less likely, but somewhat plausible), to calling everybody an asshat (the point at which the parody is acknowledged).

I won’t lie; I thought this might last about a week.

Even early on, I alternated between insanity (“When I’m wearing my Jayhawks shirt around campus tomorrow, it’s the only thing ever that could prevent me from getting laid”) and pseudo-social commentary (“Fuck having to work tonight at a job that I voluntarily hold not because I have pressing financial need but for beer money”). And that was the blueprint.

And then the others got involved.

As per the request of others involved, I will choose not to indicate who the others are. I will say that, to the best of my knowledge, the total number of people who have tweeted under the name @grobitch20 is four and that the total number of people who knew before today for an absolute, tangible fact who was behind the account is around ten. With that said, about ninety-five percent of Grobitch’s tweets, including almost all of the reply tweets (even most of the ones that are replying to my personal tweets) came from me.

And so it has continued. Grobitch now has 82 followers. Holy shit, a parody account of a non-celebrity who has only followed people based on whether or not @grobot20 has tweeted at them has EIGHTY-TWO FOLLOWERS. I’m amazed, personally. It’s been a hell of a ride. Will it continue now that the truth is known? I don’t see why not. To some extent, Grobitch had probably seen better days even without being outed. One thing I can promise is that Grobitch will be deleted before it ever resorts to insisting on prior review from, as he would put it, “Real Me”. Thanks to everybody who has made this the most fun ten months anyone could ever hope to have on Twitter.

Love,         
John (@johnjf125)

P.S.—If you have any further questions about Grobitch or the Grobitch process, leave them in the comments section or DM me (either under @johnjf125 or @grobitch20 will be fine) and I’d be happy to answer them under a separate post.